Nicky Rivera et al v. Midway Importing, Inc., No. 2:2018cv01469 - Document 58 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS MIDWAY IMPORTING, INC. AND GRISI USA, LLC by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 42 and dismissed the Second Amended Class Action Complaint with prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Final Judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
Nicky Rivera et al v. Midway Importing, Inc. Doc. 58 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Balmore Prudencio and Michelle Quintero, Case No. 2:18-cv-01469-AB-RAO individually on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and John Does (1-100) on behalf of themselves and all [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT others similarly situated, IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS MIDWAY IMPORTING, INC. AND Plaintiffs, GRISI USA, LLC vs. Midway Importing, Inc. and Grisi USA, LLC Defendants. ` 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 238292157 FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS MIDWAY IMPORTING, INC. AND GRISI USA, LLC Dockets.Justia.com 1 Defendants Grisi USA, LLC and Midway Importing, Inc. (collectively 2 “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Class Action Complaint (the 3 “Motion”) came on for hearing on December 14, 2018 at 8:00 am in Courtroom 7B of 4 the above-entitled Court, the Honorable André Birotte Jr. presiding. On December 19, 5 2018, after full consideration of the Motion and arguments of counsel, the Court 6 granted Defendants’ Motion and dismissed the Second Amended Class Action 7 Complaint with prejudice. 8 9 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Final Judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: January 08, 2019 ____________________________ Honorable André Birotte Jr. United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS MIDWAY IMPORTING, INC. AND GRISI USA, LLC

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.