Mario Williams v. Warren Montgomery, No. 2:2017cv08068 - Document 28 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 26 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (see order for details) (hr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mario Williams v. Warren Montgomery Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) WARREN MONTGOMERY, ) ) Respondent. _________________________________ ) MARIO WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. NO. CV 17-8068-CJC (KS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States 20 Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 21 Recommendation (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which 23 objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and 24 recommendations set forth in the Report. 25 \\ 26 \\ 27 \\ 28 \\ Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: November 26, 2018 ________________________________ CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
