Serge Haitayan et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 2:2017cv07454 - Document 352 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, Counter Claimant 7-Eleven and against Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their First Amended Complaint, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
Serge Haitayan et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc. Doc. 352 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 SERGE HAITAYAN, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 vs. Case No. 2:17-cv-7454 DSF (ASx) FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT/ COUNTERCLAIMANT 7-ELEVEN, INC. 7-ELEVEN, INC., a Texas corporation, Defendant. 17 18 19 The remaining claims and counter-claim asserted by the parties in this matter 20 were tried to the Court on March 23 and March 24, 2021. Having heard and reviewed 21 the evidence and having considered the parties’ post-trial submissions, the Court 22 entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Court Trial on September 8, 23 2021, finding for Defendant/Counter-claimant 7-Eleven, Inc. (“7-Eleven”) on all 24 remaining claims asserted by the Plaintiffs in this matter. Dkt. 350. In accordance with 25 those findings, judgment is hereby entered in 7-Eleven’s favor on all of Plaintiffs’ 26 remaining claims. 7-Eleven’s Counterclaim (Dkt. 34), which seeks declaratory relief 27 in the event Plaintiffs were deemed employees, and 7-Eleven’s Third-Party Complaint 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 (Dkt. 38), which seeks indemnification and declaratory relief from a third party related 2 to one of the Plaintiff’s claims, are hereby dismissed as moot. Therefore: 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment 4 is entered in favor of 7-Eleven and against Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs’ First Amended 5 Complaint. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their First Amended Complaint, and 6 this action is dismissed with prejudice. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 1, 2021 Honorable Dale S. Fischer UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.