Ross Klein et al v. MONY Life Insurance Company of America, No. 2:2017cv07003 - Document 59 (C.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Pursuant to the Courts Order [ECF No. 56], the Second Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Ross Klein, Klein Metals, Inc., and Klein Enterprises Inc. (Plaintiffs), in its entirety, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Defendant MONY Life Insurance Company of America is the prevailing party in this action and is entitled to recover costs from Plaintiffs. (shb)

Download PDF
Ross Klein et al v. MONY Life Insurance Company of America Doc. 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ROSS KLEIN, KLEIN METALS, INC. and ) CASE NO. 2:17-cv-7003KLEIN ENTERPRISES, INC., ) RSWL-AS ) Plaintiffs, ) FINAL JUDGMENT ) v. ) MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) ) AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: On May 30, 2018, the Court entered an order granting defendant MONY 19 20 Life Insurance Company of America’s (“MLOA”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ 21 Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) without leave to amend 22 (the “Order”). [ECF No. 56.] NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 23 1. Pursuant to the Court’s Order [ECF No. 56], the Second Amended 24 25 Complaint of Plaintiffs Ross Klein, Klein Metals, Inc., and Klein 26 Enterprises Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), in its entirety, is DISMISSED WITH 27 PREJUDICE; and 28 // -1[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Defendant MONY Life Insurance Company of America is the 2 prevailing party in this action and is entitled to recover costs from 3 Plaintiffs. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 18, 2018 s/ RONALD S.W. LEW Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew United States District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1107891/35747312v.1 CNA/1048866/6310288v.1 -2[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.