Brandon Ruiz v. K. Robinson et al, No. 2:2017cv06112 - Document 15 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendat ion of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Plaintiff's objections to the Report ("Objections"). The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Complaint is DISMISSED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 10 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brandon Ruiz v. K. Robinson et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 BRANDON RUIZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) K. ROBINSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. _________________________________ ) NO. CV 17-6112-FMO (KS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Plaintiff’s objections to the Report (“Objections”).. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Complaint is DISMISSED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 10, 2018 __________________/s/_________________ FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
