Fernando Aranda v. R. Fisher, Jr., No. 2:2017cv05457 - Document 43 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge David O. CarterIT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely is granted; (2) Petitioner's Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing is denied; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 15 , 1 , 19 , 41 (sbou)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Fernando Aranda v. R. Fisher, Jr. Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 FERNANDO ARANDA, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 v. R. FISHER, JR., 16 Respondent. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 17-5457-DOC (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 20 Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation. 21 The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely is 23 granted; (2) Petitioner’s Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing is denied; and (3) Judgment shall 24 be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 DATED: September 28, 2018 DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
