Kylie Herd v. Airbus SAS et al, No. 2:2017cv05001 - Document 38 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND ROLLS-ROYCE PLC by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. NOW THEREFORE, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of Airbus S.A.S. and Rolls-Royce PLC and against Plaintiff on all claims asserted in this action. (mrgo)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kylie Herd v. Airbus SAS et al Doc. 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLIE HERD, an individual, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 AIRBUS S.A.S., a foreign corporation doing business in the State of California; AIRBUS GROUP HQ INC., a corporation doing business in the State of California; ROLLSROYCE plc, a foreign corporation doing business in the State of California, 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-05001 ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND ROLLS-ROYCE PLC Defendant. 19 WHEREAS, on July 7, 2017, Plaintiff Kylie Herd (“Plaintiff”) filed this 20 21 action before this Court; WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Airbus Group 22 23 HQ Inc. from this action; 24 WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, Defendant Airbus S.A.S. moved to 25 dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Damages based on the forum non conveniens 26 doctrine and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27 12(b)(6); 28 /// [PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND ROLLS-ROYCE PLC Dockets.Justia.com 1 WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, Defendant Rolls-Royce PLC joined in 2 the section of Airbus S.A.S.’s motion to dismiss that was based on the forum non 3 conveniens doctrine; 4 WHEREAS, on December 11, 2017, this Court granted Airbus S.A.S.’s and 5 Rolls-Royce PLC’s motion to dismiss based on the forum non conveniens doctrine. 6 NOW THEREFORE, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that final judgment 7 is entered in favor of Airbus S.A.S. and Rolls-Royce PLC and against Plaintiff on 8 all claims asserted in this action. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: December 27, 2017. 13 Hon. Stephen V. Wilson 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND ROLLS-ROYCE PLC
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
