Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. v. Secureauth Corporation, No. 2:2017cv04314 - Document 138 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED THAT: Judgment is hereby entered in favor of SecdureAuth and against StrikeForce as to the invalidity of the Asserted Claims. (SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. v. Secureauth Corporation Doc. 138 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WESTERN DIVISION 13 14 15 STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, 16 17 v. 18 SECUREAUTH CORPORATION, 19 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-04314-JAK-SK FINAL JUDGMENT JS-6 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com On July 17, 2017, StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (“StrikeForce”) filed 1 2 a 3 (“SecureAuth”) of infringing Claims 1, 7, 11, 17-19, 21, 22, 28, 31, 37, and 4 38 of U.S. Patent 7,870,599, Claims 1-6, 8, 10-16, 20-22, 46-48, and 50-54 of 5 U.S. Patent 8,484,698, and Claims 1, 7, 11, and 17-19 of U.S. Patent 6 8,713,701 (the “Asserted Claims”). 7 8 First Amended Complaint accusing SecureAuth Corporation On July 21, 2017, SecureAuth filed a Motion to Dismiss on the basis that the Asserted Claims were all invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 9 On December 1, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting 10 SecureAuth’s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice thereby invalidating all 11 Asserted Claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED THAT: 13 14 15 16 17 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of SecureAuth and against StrikeForce as to the invalidity of the Asserted Claims; 2. StrikeForce shall take nothing and all claims asserted by StrikeForce against SecureAuth in this action are dismissed with prejudice; 3. SecureAuth may seek to recover costs in the sum of an amount 18 to be determined by the filing and approval of the appropriate application. 19 The amount determined may be subject to a tax and/or interest at the legal 20 rate as provided by law; and 21 4. Because no claims remain in this action, the Court directs the 22 Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above pursuant to Federal Rule 23 of Civil Procedure 58. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: December 28, 2017 JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 -1-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
