Adam Trotter v. ExxonMobil Corp. et al, No. 2:2017cv02279 - Document 142 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. For the reasons stated in the Courts November 29, 2018 Order GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 140), FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, and ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company, and against Plaintiff Adam Trotter. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Adam Trotter v. ExxonMobil Corp. et al Doc. 142 1 E-FILED 12/13/18 JS-6 [CASE CLOSED] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 ADAM TROTTER, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 EXXONMOBIL CORP., et al., 16 Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-02279-PSG (JCx) Judge: Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez Courtroom: 6A [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 For the reasons stated in the Court’s November 29, 2018 Order GRANTING 2 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 140), FINAL JUDGMENT IS 3 HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil 4 Corporation, and ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company, and against Plaintiff 5 Adam Trotter. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: __________________________ 12/13/18 _______________________________ The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 2:17-CV-02279-PSG (JCX)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
