Shirley Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership et al, No. 2:2017cv00333 - Document 71 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Judgment is entered for Defendants on Plaintiffs ADA claims. 2. Plaintiff shall take nothing on her ADA claims against Defendants. 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claim under the Unruh Civil Rights Act claim and DISMISSES that claim without prejudice. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 70 . (lom)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Shirley Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership et al Doc. 71 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 United States District Court Central District of California 7 8 9 10 SHIRLEY LINDSAY, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:17-cv-0333-ODW(AS) FINAL JUDGMENT v. 1777 WESTWOOD LIMITED PARTNRESHIP; a California Limited Partnership; FARZIN HALAVY; SUTTHIWAN SOONTORNVIPAT; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 16, 2017 Plaintiff Shirley Lindsay initiated this Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) case against Defendants 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership, Farvin Halavy, and Sutthiwan Soontornvipat. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On March 5, 2018, Defendants moved for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff’s ADA claims and requested that the Court decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state-law claim under the Unruh Civil Rights Act. (ECF No. 50.) The Court granted Defendants’ Motion in full (ECF No. 70.) /// /// /// /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 2 1. Judgment is entered for Defendants on Plaintiff’s ADA claims. 3 2. Plaintiff shall take nothing on her ADA claims against Defendants. 4 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over 5 Plaintiff’s claim under the Unruh Civil Rights Act claim and 6 DISMISSES that claim without prejudice. 7 8 9 The Court VACATES all dates and deadlines. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 August 20, 2018 12 13 14 15 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
