James Jamil Garrett v. J. Gastelo et al, No. 2:2016cv09668 - Document 21 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge 20 . See 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections to the R. & R. have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's FAC is denied without leave to amend and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
James Jamil Garrett v. J. Gastelo et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES JAMIL GARRETT, Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 DR. JOHANNES HAAR, Defendant. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-9668-CAS (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 The Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, records 18 on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. 19 See 28 U.S.C. § 636. 20 filed. 21 Magistrate Judge. 22 No objections to the R. & R. have been The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s FAC is denied 23 without leave to amend and Judgment be entered dismissing this 24 action with prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: November 20, 2017 CHRISTINA A. SNYDER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.