Richard Owens v. A. Matthews et al, No. 2:2016cv07755 - Document 31 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 26 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the order granting Plaintiffs Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee (Dkt. No. 4) be VACATED; (2) the Orders Directing Service (Dkt. Nos. 5, 6, 8) be VACATED; and (3) Plaintiffs lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants and all claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $400.00. (sbu)

Download PDF
Richard Owens v. A. Matthews et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 RICHARD OWENS, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 15 16 A. MATTHEWS, Defendant. _________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 16-7755-JFW (KS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records 19 herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) 20 and Plaintiff’s Objection to Motion to Dismiss Complaint (“Objections”) construed as 21 objections to the Report Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), 22 the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which 23 objections have been stated. 24 25 Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations 26 set forth in the Report. 27 Plaintiff’s Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee (Dkt. No. 4) be 28 VACATED; (2) the Orders Directing Service (Dkt. Nos. 5, 6, 8) be VACATED; and (3) Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the order granting 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Plaintiff’s lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants and all claims 2 unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $400.00. 3 4 5 DATED: February 13, 2017 ________________________________ JOHN F. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.