Guadalupe Delgado v. Warden, No. 2:2016cv06428 - Document 18 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any objections to that Report and Recommendation, 15 and the deadline for doing so has passed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (dv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Guadalupe Delgado v. Warden Doc. 18 1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUADALUPE DELGADO, 12 13 14 15 Case No. CV-16-6428-AG (KES) Petitioner, v. DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other 18 records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 19 Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any objections to that Report and 20 Recommendation, and the deadline for doing so has passed. The Court accepts the 21 findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 23 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. DATED: July 30, 2017 25 26 27 ____________________________________ ANDREW J. GUILFORD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
