Strategic Partners Inc. v. Vestagen Protective Technologies Inc., No. 2:2016cv05900 - Document 257 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Refer to the document for details. (pso)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Strategic Partners Inc. v. Vestagen Protective Technologies Inc. Doc. 257 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 8 9 STRATEGIC PARTNERS, INC., 10 Plaintiff, 11 Case No.: 2:16-CV-5900-RGK Judge: Hon. R. Gary Klausner [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT vs. Trial Date: September 19, 2017 VESTAGEN PROTECTIVE Complaint Filed: August 8, 2016 13 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Counterclaims Filed: September 19, 2016 14 Defendant. 15 VESTAGEN PROTECTIVE 16 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 17 Counterclaim Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 STRATEGIC PARTNERS, INC., 20 Counterclaim Defendant. 21 12 22 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 4843-7536-1874 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered on the complaint of Plaintiff 2 Strategic Partners, Inc. for false advertising in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a), 3 unfair business practices in violation of California Business & Professions Code section 4 17200, and untrue and misleading advertising in violation of California Business & 5 Professions Code section 17500 in favor of Defendant Vestagen Protective Technologies, 6 Inc. and against Strategic Partners, Inc. 7 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered on the 8 counterclaim of Counterclaimant Vestagen Protective Technologies for false advertising in 9 violation of 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a), breach of contract, and misappropriation of trade 10 secrets in favor of Counterclaim Defendant Strategic Partners, Inc and against 11 Counterclaimant Vestagen Protective Technologies, Inc. 12 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will decide the issues of 13 costs and attorneys’ fees after review of the parties’ submissions on these issues. 14 15 16 Date: November 20, 2017 _______________________________ 17 Hon. R. Gary Klausner 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
