Allied Concrete and Supply Co. et al v. Edmund Gerald Brown Jr., et al, No. 2:2016cv04830 - Document 127 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AFTER REMAND by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Pursuant to the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit 125 , the Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment entered on 3/14/2017 (Doc. 102 ) is hereby vacated and the Court hereby issues a new Final Judgment in this action as follows: The motion by International Brotherhood of Teamsters to intervene as a defendant 126 is granted. Judgment is entered for defendants and against plaintiffs on all claims. (jp)

Download PDF
Allied Concrete and Supply Co. et al v. Edmund Gerald Brown Jr., et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Doc. 127 SCOTT A. KRONLAND (SBN 171693) STACEY M. LEYTON (SBN 203827) ERIC P. BROWN (SBN 284245) ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 E-mail: skronland@altber.com sleyton@altber.com ebrown@altber.com Attorneys for Proposed Intervenor International Brotherhood of Teamsters 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 ALLIED CONCRETE AND SUPPLY CO., et al., Plaintiffs, 14 15 18 [Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT AFTER REMAND Place: Courtroom 850 Judge: Hon. R. Gary Klausner v. 16 17 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-04830-RGK-FFM EDMUND GERALD BROWN JR., et al., Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT AFTER REMAND, Case No. 2:16-cv-04830-RGK-FFM Dockets.Justia.com [Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT AFTER REMAND 1 2 Pursuant to the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit, the Permanent Injunction 3 and Final Judgment entered on March 14, 2017 (Doc. 102) is hereby vacated and the 4 Court hereby issues a new Final Judgment in this action as follows: 5 The motion by International Brotherhood of Teamsters to intervene as a 6 defendant is granted. Judgment is entered for defendants and against plaintiffs on 7 all claims. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: May 17, 2019 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT AFTER REMAND, Case No. 2:16-cv-04830-RGK-FFM 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.