Cory Dwayne Micenheimer v. P. Finander et al, No. 2:2016cv04314 - Document 91 (C.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action against Defendants Finander, Morris, Shank, and Rabanipour with prejudice and dismissing the action against the Doe defendant without prejudice. (See document for details.) re 85 (sbou)

Download PDF
Cory Dwayne Micenheimer v. P. Finander et al Doc. 91 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. P. FINANDER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action against Defendants Finander, Morris, Shank, and Rabanipour with prejudice and dismissing the action against the Doe defendant without prejudice. DATED: October 16, 2018 CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.