Richard Owens v. Soto et al, No. 2:2016cv03577 - Document 33 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 31 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Order granting Plaintiff IFP status (Dkt. No. 14) be VACATED; (2) the December 19, 2016, Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 29) be VACATED; and (3) Plaintiffs lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants and all claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $400.00. (sbu)
Download PDF
Richard Owens v. Soto et al Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 RICHARD OWENS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) SOTO, Warden, et al, ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) NO. CV 16-3577-JFW (KS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended 19 Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United 20 States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The time for filing Objections to the Report has 21 passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its 22 review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 25 (1) the Order granting Plaintiff IFP status (Dkt. No. 14) be VACATED; 26 (2) the December 19, 2016, Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 29) be 27 VACATED; and 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 (3) Plaintiff’s lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants 2 and all claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full 3 required filing fee of $400.00. 4 5 DATED: February 13, 2017 6 ________________________________ JOHN F. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.