Susana Lazos v. Carolyn W. Colvin, No. 2:2016cv03405 - Document 21 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this order, the decision of the Commissioner is r eversed and remanded for further proceedings to (1) reconsider Dr. Spayde's opinion and a sit/stand option; (2) reconsider Dr. Caruso-Radin's opinion that Lazos is limited to simple, two-step instructions; and (3) reconsider Dr. Kaiser's opinion. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (mp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Susana Lazos v. Carolyn W. Colvin Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUSANA LAZOS, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 16-3405-AGR MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 17 18 19 20 On March 13, 2017, this court issued a Report and Recommendation in this action. (Dkt. Nos. 17-18.) 21 On March 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed a statement of consent to proceed before the 22 magistrate judge. (Dkt. No. 19.) Defendant had previously filed a consent. (Dkt. No. 23 11.) The action was reassigned to this court for all further proceedings. (Dkt. No. 20.) 24 25 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation now becomes the opinion and order of this court. 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the report and 2 recommendation, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this order, the decision 3 of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings to (1) 4 reconsider Dr. Spayde’s opinion and a sit/stand option; (2) reconsider Dr. Caruso- 5 Radin’s opinion that Lazos is limited to simple, two-step instructions; and (3) reconsider 6 Dr. Kaiser’s opinion. 7 8 9 10 DATED: March 28, 2017 ALICIA G. ROSENBERG United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
