Tyrone T. Corsey v. LA County-LAPD 77 Div et al, No. 2:2016cv03343 - Document 11 (C.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDE by Judge S. James Otero for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 9 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute and for the reasons stated in the June 3 and August 10, 2016 dismissal orders. (See Order for details) (bem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Tyrone T. Corsey v. LA County-LAPD 77 Div et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TYRONE T. CORSEY, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEP’T (DIVISION 77) et al., 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-3343-SJO (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 The Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, records 17 on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. 18 See 28 U.S.C. § 636. 19 Recommendation have been filed. 20 and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 21 No objections to the Report and The Court accepts the findings IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed for 22 failure to prosecute and for the reasons stated in the June 3 and 23 August 10, 2016 dismissal orders. 24 25 26 DATED: November 2, 2016. S. JAMES OTERO U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
