Anthony Terrel Williams v. Warren L. Montgomery, No. 2:2016cv03126 - Document 26 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 24 (sbu)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Anthony Terrel Williams v. Warren L. Montgomery Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ANTHONY TERRELL WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) ) WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, ) Respondent. ) _________________________________ ) NO. CV 16-3126-AB (KS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 Corpus (“Petition”), the Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) and related briefing, the Report and 20 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to 21 the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). As per 28 U.S.C. § 22 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those 23 portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set 2 forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) 3 the Petition is DENIED; (3) Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is DENIED; and (4) Judgment 4 shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 5 6 DATED: March 26, 2017 ________________________________ ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
