Rodriguez v. Langford, No. 2:2016cv03007 - Document 11 (C.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of th e United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (lwag)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rodriguez v. Langford Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 O 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL RODRIGUEZ, 12 Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 STEVE LANGFORD (Warden), 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-03007-RGK (KES) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other 18 records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 19 Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 20 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. 21 The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the 23 Petition with prejudice. 24 25 DATED: September 16, 2016 26 27 28 _______________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
