Carmelo Raul Haynes v. G. Biaggini et al, No. 2:2016cv01949 - Document 37 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 35 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of t he United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is granted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
Carmelo Raul Haynes v. G. Biaggini et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 CARMELO RAUL HAYNES, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. G. BIAGGINI, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-1949-ODW (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice. 25 26 27 DATED: October 30, 2017 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.