Jacquorie Stansell v. Warren L. Montgomery, No. 2:2016cv01223 - Document 36 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 27 . IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (See Order for details) (bem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jacquorie Stansell v. Warren L. Montgomery Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACQUORIE STANSELL, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, 15 16 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-1223-DSF (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the 17 Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. 18 Magistrate Judge. On May 25, 2017, Petitioner filed Objections, 19 in which he objects to the R. & R. in its entirety, relying on 20 the arguments in the Petition and Traverse. Those arguments were 21 thoroughly addressed and rejected in the R. &. R. Having 22 reviewed de novo those portions of the R. & R. to which 23 objections were filed, the Court accepts the findings and 24 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 25 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and 26 Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 27 6/27/17 28 DATED: DALE S. FISCHER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
