Altair Instruments, Inc. v. Riiviva, LLC et al, No. 2:2016cv01136 - Document 39 (C.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Altair Instruments, Inc. against Riiviva, LLC: NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. In light of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment against Defendant Riiviva, LLC, an d good cause having been shown, the Court hereby enters final judgment in this matter as follows: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: (1) Defendant Riiviva, LLC ("Defendant") shall pay Altair $32,940.74; and (2) Defendant shall pay Altair 13% of the gross amount received for the sale of any device that would infringe the '739 patent, including but not limited to the device shown in Exhibit A hereto. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Altair Instruments, Inc. v. Riiviva, LLC et al Doc. 39 1 NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 2 3 E-FILED: 12/07/2016 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALTAIR INSTRUMENTS, INC., a California corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 RIIVIVA, LLC, a Delaware limited 15 liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Case No. 2:16−cv−01136−PSG−JPR [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez In light of Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment 19 against Defendant Riiviva, LLC, and good cause having been shown, the Court 20 hereby enters final judgment in this matter as follows: 21 It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 22 (1) 23 24 Defendant Riiviva, LLC (“Defendant”) shall pay Altair $32,940.74; and (2) Defendant, and all persons or entities acting in concert or participation 25 with Defendant, are hereby permanently enjoined, until Altair’s United 26 States patent no. 6,241,739 (the “’739 patent”) expires, from making, 27 using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the Unites States, any 28 2118/024004-0022 10252139.1 a10/24/16 -1- [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 device that infringes one or more claims of the ‘739 patent, including 2 the device that is the subject of this action and is shown, for example, 3 in Exhibit A hereto; [or, alternatively, instead of a permanent injunction] 4 5 (2) Defendant shall pay Altair 13% of the gross amount received for the 6 sale of any device that would infringe the ‘739 patent, including but not 7 limited to the device shown in Exhibit A hereto. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED. 9 10 12/7/16 11 Dated: _____________________ _______________________________ United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2118/024004-0022 10252139.1 a10/24/16 -2- [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
