Edgar Suchite v. W. L. Montgomery, No. 2:2015cv08587 - Document 30 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of th e United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (dro)

Download PDF
Edgar Suchite v. W. L. Montgomery Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 Case No. CV 15-8587-JFW (KES) EDGAR SUCHITE, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other 18 records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 19 Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 20 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. 21 The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. 24 25 26 27 DATED: January 10, 2017 ____________________________________ JOHN F. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.