Ryan Masters v. Calvin Johnson, No. 2:2015cv04231 - Document 13 (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United Stat es Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing Petitioner's claims regarding his designation without prejudice and dismissing his claim challenging the decision that he is not eligible for the Residential Drug Abuse Program with prejudice. (lwag)

Download PDF
Ryan Masters v. Calvin Johnson Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 RYAN MASTERS, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 CALVIN JOHNSON, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 15-04231-RGK (DFM) Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 20 Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Report and 21 Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and 22 recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing 2 Petitioner’s claims regarding his designation without prejudice and dismissing 3 his claim challenging the decision that he is not eligible for the Residential 4 Drug Abuse Program with prejudice. 5 6 Dated: January 21, 2016 ______________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.