Alice Lee v. Global Tel Link Corporation, No. 2:2015cv02495 - Document 211 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Class Counsel are hereby awarded $2,127,085.00 as their fee award, and $75,980.30 for reimbursement of expenses, which amounts shall be paid to Class Counsel from the Settlement Fund.Plaintiff Davi d Martin is hereby awarded $6,250.00 as an incentive award, to be paid from the Settlement Fund. Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice, without costs to any party, except as expressly provided for in the Court's September 24, 2018 Order and this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Alice Lee v. Global Tel Link Corporation Doc. 211 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALICE LEE, et al., v. Plaintiffs, GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 2:15-cv-02495-ODW-PLA [consolidated with 2:15-cv-03464ODW-PLA] FINAL JUDGMENT Hon. Otis D. Wright II /// /// /// FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com On September 24, 2018, the Court entered its Order Granting Final Approval; Granting, In Part, Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Service Award; and Denying Petition 206. The Court now enters this Final Judgment: $75,980.30 for reimbursement of expenses, which amounts shall be paid to Class the terms of the Settlement Agreement. for Disbursement (hereinafter "the Court's September 24, 2018 Order"). ECF No. 1. Class Counsel are hereby awarded $2,127,085.00 as their fee award, and Counsel from the Settlement Fund in accordance with and at the times prescribed by 2. Plaintiff David Martin is hereby awarded $6,250.00 as an incentive award, to be paid from the Settlement Fund in accordance with and at the time prescribed by the terms of the Settlement Agreement. the Settlement Agreement with respect to distribution of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, according to the terms and at the times prescribed by the Settlement Agreement. and each and every one of the Settlement Class Members, are permanently barred and or as a class, or in any other capacity, and of the Released Claims against any of the 3. The Claims Administrator is hereby ordered to comply with the terms of the Service Award, and the Settlement Awards to the Settlement Class Members, 4. As of the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement, the Class Plaintiff enjoined from asserting, commencing, prosecuting, or continuing, either individually Released Parties, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice, without costs to any party, except 5. This is the final judgment for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 58, and the as expressly provided for in the Court's September 24, 2018 Order and this Judgment. all exhibits attached thereto) and any and all negotiations, documents, and discussions violation of any statute, law, rule, regulation or principle of common law or equity, or 1 6. Neither this judgment, nor the Settlement Agreement (including any and associated with it shall be deemed or construed to be an admission or evidence of any FINAL JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-02495-ODW-PLA of any liability or wrongdoing by Defendant Global Tel*Link Corporation, or the truth of any of the claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/05/2018 HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 FINAL JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-02495-ODW-PLA
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
