Phillips 66 Company vs. T.M. B. Enterprises Inc et al, No. 2:2015cv01962 - Document 108 (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST GUARANTOR THOMAS HELO by Judge George H. Wu, 105 Phillips 66 Company is owed the amount of $285,025.89 by Thomas Helo; 2. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to prejudgment interest against Thomas Helo at the rate of &# 036;47.95 per day from March 28, 2012 to May 3, 2016, in the amount of $71,779.28; 3. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to additional prejudgment interest against Thomas Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from May 4, 2016 to the day befor e the date of this judgment; 4. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to post-judgment interest against Thomas Helo from the date of this judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1961; 5. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to reasonable attorneys fe es against Thomas Helo in the amount of $168,401.95 and litigation expenses against Thomas Helo in the amount of $1,178.65; and 6. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to costs of court. 7. Phillips 66 is entitled to all writs and process necessary to enforce andcollect this judgment. 8. This judgment finally disposes of all remaining parties and all remaining claims, and is appealable. (pj)

Download PDF
Phillips 66 Company vs. T.M. B. Enterprises Inc et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 108 Darin L. Brooks Texas State Bar No. 00796252 dbrooks@grayreed.com Brian E. Waters Texas State Bar No. 24078035 bwaters@grayreed.com GRAY REED & MCGRAW, P.C. 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2000 Houston, Texas 77056 Phone: (713) 986-7000 Facsimile: (713) 986-7100 Attorneys for Plaintiff Phillips 66 Company 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. T.M.B. ENTERPRISES, INC., THOMAS HELO AND SUZANNE HELO, Defendants. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 15-1962-GW(JPRx) FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST GUARANTOR THOMAS HELO 20 21 22 Before the Court is Plaintiff Phillips 66 Company’s Motion for Final 23 Summary Judgment against Thomas Helo. After consideration of the papers in 24 support of and in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the 25 pleadings and papers on file, and any arguments of counsel and pro se defendant 26 Thomas Helo, the Court orders summary judgment in favor of Phillips 66 27 Company as follows: 28 -1FINAL JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-01962-GW-JPR Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. Helo; 2 3 Phillips 66 Company is owed the amount of $285,025.89 by Thomas 2. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to prejudgment interest against Thomas 4 Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from March 28, 2012 to May 3, 2016, 5 in the amount of $71,779.28; 6 3. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to additional prejudgment interest 7 against Thomas Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from May 4, 2016 to 8 the day before the date of this judgment; 9 4. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to post-judgment interest against 10 Thomas Helo from the date of this judgment in accordance with 28 11 U.S.C. § 1961; 12 5. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees against 13 Thomas Helo in the amount of $168,401.95 and litigation expenses 14 against Thomas Helo in the amount of $1,178.65; and 15 6. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to costs of court. 16 7. Phillips 66 is entitled to all writs and process necessary to enforce and collect this judgment. 17 18 19 8. This judgment finally disposes of all remaining parties and all remaining claims, and is appealable. 20 21 Dated: June 7, 2016 22 23 24 HON. GEORGE H. WU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 -2FINAL JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-01962-GW-JPR

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.