Gustavo Gomez v. Julie Jones et al, No. 2:2015cv01062 - Document 13 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United St ates Magistrate Judge 10 . Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action, without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction with respect to Ground One, and with prejudice with respect to Ground Two. (kl)

Download PDF
Gustavo Gomez v. Julie Jones et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 GUSTAVO GOMEZ, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 JULIE JONES, et al., Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 15-1062-DMG (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, 18 and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed 19 Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and 20 Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. 21 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Court accepts the findings and 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition for Writ 23 of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action, without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction with respect 24 to Ground One, and with prejudice with respect to Ground Two. 25 26 DATED: 27 August 17, 2015 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.