United States of America et al v. Insys Therapeutics Inc, No. 2:2014cv09179 - Document 71 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: (1) All claims brought by or on behalf of the United States against Insys are dismissed (a) with prejudice to the United States with respect to the Covered Conduct as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement between the United States and Insys, (b) without prejudice to the United States with respect to all other claims, and (c) with prejudice to the relator. (2) This action is dismissed in its entirety. Related to: Stipulation for Order 70 . (jp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America et al v. Insys Therapeutics Inc Doc. 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. TORGNY ANDERSSON, Plaintiffs, No. 2:14-cv-09179-JLS-AJW FINAL JUDGMENT v. INSYS THERAPEUTICS, INC., Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 On November 26, 2014, relator Torgny Andersson filed this action pursuant to the 2 False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, against defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc. 3 (“Insys”) (Doc. 1). On or about April 13, 2018, the United States intervened in part and 4 declined to intervene in part in this action (Doc. 53). 5 On June 5, 2019, the United States of America and Insys reached a settlement as 6 to the United States’ claims against Insys. On June 11, 2020, the Court filed an Order 7 dismissing all claims brought by or on behalf of the United States against Insys (a) with 8 prejudice to the United States with respect to the Covered Conduct as that term is 9 defined in the Settlement Agreement between the United States and Insys, (b) without 10 prejudice to the United States with respect to all other claims, and (c) with prejudice to 11 the relator (Doc. 65). 12 13 14 15 16 On September 28, 2021, the Court filed a minute order dismissing this action for failure to prosecute (Doc. 69). Upon stipulation of the parties, by their respective counsel, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. All claims brought by or on behalf of the United States against Insys are 17 dismissed (a) with prejudice to the United States with respect to the 18 Covered Conduct as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement 19 between the United States and Insys, (b) without prejudice to the United 20 States with respect to all other claims, and (c) with prejudice to the relator. 21 2. This action is dismissed in its entirety. 22 23 24 25 Dated: March 29, 2022 _______________________________ HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
