Henry Floyd Bow v. Heidi M. Lackner, No. 2:2014cv05484 - Document 57 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge S. James Otero. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the First Amended Petition is denied, Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied, and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 56 (bem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Henry Floyd Bow v. Heidi M. Lackner Doc. 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HENRY FLOYD BOW, 14 ) Case No. CV 14-5484-SJO (JPR) ) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) ) ) ) 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 10 Petitioner, 11 v. 12 JOEL MARTINEZ, Warden, 13 Respondent. 16 First Amended Petition, records on file, and Report and 17 Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. No objections to the 18 Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the 19 findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 20 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the First Amended Petition is 21 denied, Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is 22 denied, and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with 23 prejudice. 24 25 DATED: January 13, 2017 26 S. JAMES OTERO U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
