Beverly Hills Unified School District v. Federal Transit Administration et al, No. 2:2013cv08609 - Document 18 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and the Court's Order Regarding Satisfaction of Remand and Further Litigation (Docket No. 275) ("Order"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Beverly Hills Unified School District v. Federal Transit Administration et al Doc. 18 JS-6 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 3 BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 4 5 6 Case No. CV 12-9861-GW(SSx) Consolidated with No. CV 13-8609-GW(SSx) Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT v. 7 8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, et al., 9 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Final Judgment CASE NO. CV 12-9861-GW (SSx) Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and the Court’s Order 2 Regarding Satisfaction of Remand and Further Litigation (Docket No. 275) (“Order”), IT 3 IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 4 1. On August 12, 2016, the Court issued a Final Decision on Motions for 5 Summary Judgment and Ruling in Regards to Remedy (Docket No. 188) (“Final 6 Decision”), granting in part and denying in part the motion for summary judgment filed 7 by Plaintiff Beverly Hills Unified School District (“the School District”) and granting in 8 part and denying in part the motion for summary judgment filed by Federal Defendants 9 Federal Transit Administration et al. (“Federal Defendants”); 10 2. On December 8, 2017, the Federal Defendants filed a Notice of Satisfaction 11 of Remand (Docket No. 273) (“Notice”) indicating they had completed the procedural 12 tasks outlined in the Court’s Final Decision. 13 3. As to the claims on which the School District prevailed, as identified in the 14 Final Decision, judgment is entered in favor of the School District. Such claims are 15 dismissed as moot in light of the Order. 16 4. As to all other claims, judgment is entered in favor of the Federal 17 Defendants. Such claims are dismissed with prejudice. 18 5. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 19 6. Nothing herein modifies the Order. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 DATED: January 24, 2018 24 25 GEORGE H. WU, United States District Judge 26 27 28 [Proposed] Final Judgment CASE NO. CV 12-9861-GW (SSx)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
