New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh. P.A. et al, No. 2:2013cv06114 - Document 50 (C.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson in favor of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh. P.A. and against New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc. Related to: MOTION for Summary Judgment 32 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh. P.A. et al Doc. 50 1 2 3 4 5 JS-6 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 NEW HAMPSHIRE BALL BEARINGS, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 2:13-CV-06114-DDP-AGR Honorable Dean D. Pregerson v. FINAL JUDGMENT NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Corporation; CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., a Corporation, Defendants. 18 19 20 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO NATIONAL UNION FIRE 21 INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.’S 22 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 23 The motion of defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of 24 Pittsburgh, Pa. (“National Union”) for summary judgment came regularly on for 25 hearing before this Court on March 10, 2014. Michael John Miguel appeared on 26 behalf of Plaintiff New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc., and Susan Koehler 27 Sullivan appeared on behalf of National Union. After consideration of the 28 admissible evidence, the separate statements, and the authorities of the parties, and 1 DOCS/18514435v1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 for the reasons set forth in the Court’s March 10, 2014 Order, the Court hereby finds there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and defendant National Union is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to all claims for relief as follows: 1. There is no issue of material fact and defendant National Union is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief for Breach of Contract ( Duty to Defend and Indemnify); 2. There is no issue of material fact and defendant National Union is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief for Declaratory Relief (Cal. Civ. Proc. §1060); 3. There is no issue of material fact and defendant National Union is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief for Tortious Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff take nothing from defendant National Union with respect to plaintiff’s claims for relief asserted in its complaint, that the Second Amended Complaint against defendant National Union is dismissed on the merits, with prejudice, and that defendant National Union shall recover its costs of suit against plaintiff. IT IS SO ADJUDGED. 21 22 DATED: March 17, 2014 HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 DOCS/18514435v1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
