NetAirus Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc, No. 2:2013cv03780 - Document 105 (C.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") on Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC's ("NetAirus'S") claims for infringement of U.S. Pat ent No. 7,103,380 (the "'380 Patent") and Apple's counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity of the '380 Patent. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that each of NetAirus's claims is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Apple is the prevailing party in this matter and is entitled to seek costs pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(d)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
NetAirus Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc Doc. 105 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 NETAIRUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a California limited liability company, 13 14 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:13-cv-03780-JAK-E FINAL JUDGMENT JS-6 vs. 15 16 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2:13-cv-03780-JAK-E FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com FINAL JUDGMENT 1 2 The Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of Defendant Apple Inc. 3 (“Apple”) on Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC’s (“NetAirus’s”) claims for 4 infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,103,380 (the “’380 Patent”) and Apple’s 5 counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity of the ’380 Patent. 6 7 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that each of NetAirus’s claims is dismissed with prejudice. 8 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Apple is the 9 prevailing party in this matter and is entitled to seek costs pursuant to F.R.C.P. 10 54(d)(1). 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 Dated: April 12, 2016 JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -22:13-cv-03780-JAK-E FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
