Eduardo Cervantes v. County of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2012cv09889 - Document 142 (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT 11 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this matter with respect to the recovery of allowed costs as set forth in Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re. Defendant County of Los Angeles is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes as against Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros; and Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes shall recover from Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros $500,000.00 in compensatory damages and $264,304.62 in attorneys' fees and unreimbursed expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)

Download PDF
Eduardo Cervantes v. County of Los Angeles et al Doc. 142 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 EDUARDO CERVANTES, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 Case No.: CV12-09889 DDP (MRWx) FINAL JUDGMENT v. [CLOSED] COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Pursuant to Rule 54 and Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by 21 reason of the Court’s prior orders in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, 22 ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this matter with respect to the recovery of allowed costs as set forth in Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant County of Los Angeles is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes as against Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros; and Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 shall recover from Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros $500,000.00 in 2 compensatory damages and $264,304.62 in attorneys’ fees and unreimbursed 3 expenses. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: March 16, 2016 THE HONORABLE DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge Central District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.