Carlos U Lobos v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, No. 2:2012cv08461 - Document 34 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson Re Amended Report and Recommendation 30 : The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate, IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Amended Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carlos U Lobos v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLOS U. LOBOS, 12 v. 13 Petitioner, SUPERIOR COURT OF 14 CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 12-8461-SVW (OP) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on 18 file, the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, 19 and Petitioner’s Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of 20 those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has 21 objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate 22 Judge, 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Amended 2 Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the 3 Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. 4 5 6 DATED: December 19, 2013 7 HONORABLE STEPHEN V. WILSON United States District Judge 8 9 10 Prepared by: 11 12 ______________________________ HONORABLE OSWALD PARADA 13 United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
