Jordy Ochoa v. L R Thomas, No. 2:2011cv06864 - Document 151 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 150 by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jordy Ochoa v. L R Thomas Doc. 151 Case 2:11-cv-06864-JGB-GJS Document 151 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:3020 o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORDY OCHOA, Petitioner 12 13 14 15 v. L.R. THOMAS, et al., Respondents. Case No. CV 11-6864-JGB (GJS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative 28 U.S.C. § 19 2254 petition in this case (Dkt. 41-2, “Petition”) and all relevant pleadings, motions, 20 and other documents filed in this action, the original Report and Recommendation 21 of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 140), Petitioner’s Objections to the original 22 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 149), and the Final Report and Recommendation 23 of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 150, “Report”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 24 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of 25 the matters to which objections have been stated. 26 Petitioner’s assertions and arguments have been reviewed carefully. The 27 Court, however, concludes that nothing set forth in the Objections or otherwise in 28 the record for this case affects or alters, or calls into question, the findings and Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:11-cv-06864-JGB-GJS Document 151 Filed 07/27/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:3021
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
