Christian Rodriguez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2011cv01135 - Document 404 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, in accordance with the Settlement, the action is dismissed on the merits with prejudice on a class-wide basis, the Named Plaintiffs' Released Claims are dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and the City of Los Angeles shall pay attorney's fees in the amount of $5,750,000 to Plaintiffs' counsel in accordance with the terms set forth in the Order of Final Approval. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
Download PDF
Christian Rodriguez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al Doc. 404 1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 CHRISTIAN RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO CAZAREZ, individually and as class representatives 13 14 15 16 17 vs. Case No.: CV11-01135 DMG (JEMx) FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CARMEN TRUTANICH, CHARLES BECK, ALLAN NADIR, ANGEL GOMEZ AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10. 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 This action came on for hearing before the Court on December 2, 2016, on 2 Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Settlement. The Settlement 3 Agreement and objections having been fully considered, the issues having been 4 duly heard, and a decision having been duly rendered, 5 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, in accordance with the 6 Settlement, the above-captioned action is dismissed on the merits with prejudice 7 on a class-wide basis, the Named Plaintiffs’ Released Claims are dismissed on 8 the merits with prejudice, and the City of Los Angeles shall pay attorney’s fees 9 in the amount of $5,750,000 to Plaintiffs’ counsel in accordance with the terms 10 set forth in the Order of Final Approval. 11 12 13 DATED: March 24, 2017 ________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 FINAL JUDGMENT