Christian Rodriguez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2011cv01135 - Document 404 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, in accordance with the Settlement, the action is dismissed on the merits with prejudice on a class-wide basis, the Named Plaintiffs' Released Claims are dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and the City of Los Angeles shall pay attorney's fees in the amount of $5,750,000 to Plaintiffs' counsel in accordance with the terms set forth in the Order of Final Approval. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
Christian Rodriguez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al Doc. 404 1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 CHRISTIAN RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO CAZAREZ, individually and as class representatives 13 14 15 16 17 vs. Case No.: CV11-01135 DMG (JEMx) FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CARMEN TRUTANICH, CHARLES BECK, ALLAN NADIR, ANGEL GOMEZ AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10. 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 This action came on for hearing before the Court on December 2, 2016, on 2 Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Settlement. The Settlement 3 Agreement and objections having been fully considered, the issues having been 4 duly heard, and a decision having been duly rendered, 5 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, in accordance with the 6 Settlement, the above-captioned action is dismissed on the merits with prejudice 7 on a class-wide basis, the Named Plaintiffs’ Released Claims are dismissed on 8 the merits with prejudice, and the City of Los Angeles shall pay attorney’s fees 9 in the amount of $5,750,000 to Plaintiffs’ counsel in accordance with the terms 10 set forth in the Order of Final Approval. 11 12 13 DATED: March 24, 2017 ________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 FINAL JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.