NSM Resources Corp. et al v. Mountain Hardwear, Inc. et al, No. 2:2009cv07386 - Document 75 (C.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 8/26/2010, this Court granted the motion of Defendants Mountain Hardwear, Inc. and Backcountry.com, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiff Zane Murdock's Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend 73 . Accordingly, this action shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants shall be awarded taxable costs. (gk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
NSM Resources Corp. et al v. Mountain Hardwear, Inc. et al Doc. 75 JONATHAN M. GORDON (State Bar No. 82202) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 333 South Hope Street, 16th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 576-1000 Facsimile: (213) 576-1100 jonathan.gordon@alston.com JOHNATHAN E. MANSFIELD (State Bar No. 214848) Jmansfield@schwabe.com MICHAEL A. COHEN (admitted pro hac vice) Mcohen@schwabe.com SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C. 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500-2000 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 222-9981 Facsimile: (503) 796-2900 Attorneys for Defendants MOUNTAIN HARDWEAR, INC.; and BACKCOUNTRY.COM, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NSM RESOURCES CORP., a Nevada corporation; and ZANE B. MURDOCK, an individual, Case No. CV09-7386-DMG (JEMx) Plaintiffs, v. FINAL JUDGMENT MOUNTAIN HARDWEAR, INC., a Utah corporation; and BACKCOUNTRY.COM, INC., a Utah corporation, Defendants. 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PDX/106477/171852/JEM/6403665.1 Dockets.Justia.com On August 26, 2010, this Court granted the motion of Defendants Mountain Hardwear, Inc. and Backcountry.com, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiff Zane Murdock’s Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. [Doc. # 73] Accordingly, this action shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants shall be awarded taxable costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 31, 2010 _____________________________ Honorable Dolly M. Gee United States District Judge 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PDX/106477/171852/JEM/6403665.1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
