Charles Thomas Clagett, III v. J. Woodring et al, No. 2:2008cv06251 - Document 111 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for MOTION for Summary Judgment, 95 . IT IS ORDERED that: The Motion is GRANTED, in part, to grant defendants summary judgment on plaintiff's Fifth Amendment and Eighth Amendment claims based on the removal of his bedding, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice; and The Court's ruling on the remainder of the Motion, and thus on the question of whether or not summary judgment i s warranted as to the remainder of plaintiff's claims, is DEFERRED pending the further proceedings contemplated in the Report and the Magistrate Judge's issuance of a separate Report and Recommendation with respect to those remaining claims. (mz) Modified on 3/7/2012 (mz).

Download PDF
Charles Thomas Clagett, III v. J. Woodring et al Doc. 111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES T. CLAGETT, III, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. 13 14 NO. CV 08-6251-JFW (MAN) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES JOSEPH WOODRING, et al., 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Second 19 Amended Complaint, defendants' motion for summary judgment ("Motion"), 20 all of the files and records herein, the Report and Recommendation of 21 United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the Objections filed by 22 plaintiff. 23 have been filed by defendants. 24 of those portions of the Report to which Objections have been stated in 25 writing. 26 in the Report. 27 III 28 III The time for filing Objections had passed and no Objections The Court has conducted a de novo review The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED that: 1 2 3 l. The Motion is GRANTED, in part, to grant defendants summary 4 judgment 5 claims based on the removal of his bedding, and those claims are 6 dismissed with prejudice; and on plaintiff's Fifth Amendment and Eighth Amendment 7 8 2. The Court's ruling on the remainder of the Motion, and thus on the 9 question of whether or not summary judgment is warranted as to the 10 remainder of plaintiff's claims, is DEFERRED pending the further 11 proceedings contemplated in the Report and the Magistrate Judge's 12 issuance of a separate Report and Recommendation with respect to 13 those remaining claims. 14 15 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of the Order on plaintiff and on counsel for defendants. 17 18 DATED: 71~\~ 19 20 JOHN F. WALTER STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.