Guru Denim, Inc. v. Simon Halwani et al, No. 2:2008cv02803 - Document 18 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: JUDGMENT by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff Guru Denim, Inc., is hereby awarded final judgment on itsclaims for relief against Defendant Joseph Barsano in the sum of $30,000, as the prevailing pa rty in this action, pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local Rule 55-3, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees of $2,400. Plaintiff is further awarded costs, pursuant to the Copyright Act , 17 U.S.C. §504(c), to be determined by the Notice of Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs within fifteen (15) days after the entry of judgment. Furthermore, Defendant is permanently enjoined and restrained from the following activities and conduct: 1.) manufacturing, advertising, distributing, offering for sale. (See order for further details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

Download PDF
Guru Denim, Inc. v. Simon Halwani et al Doc. 18 1 2 J S -6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GURU DENIM, INC., a California CASE NO. 2:08-cv-02803-FMC-SSx Corporation, HON. FLORENCE-MARIE COOPER Plaintiff, JUDGMENT vs. SIMON HALWANI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff Guru Denim, Inc., is hereby awarded final judgment on its claims for relief against Defendant Joseph Barsano in the sum of $30,000, as the prevailing party in this action, pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local Rule 55-3, Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees of $2,400. Plaintiff is further awarded costs, pursuant to the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §504(c), to be determined by the Notice of Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs within fifteen (15) days after the entry of judgment. Furthermore, Defendant is permanently enjoined and restrained from the following activities and conduct: 1.) manufacturing, advertising, distributing, offering for 1 APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED JUDGMENT BY COURT Dockets.Justia.com 1 sale, selling, whether directly or indirectly, garments and other apparel of any kind 2 bearing Plaintiff’s Mark or names that are confusingly similar to the trademarks, 3 tradenames, designs or logos of Plaintiff. 2.) using Plaintiff’s Mark or any copy, 4 reproduction, or colorable imitation, or confusingly similar simulation of Plaintiff’s 5 Mark on or in connection with the promotion, advertising, distribution, manufacture 6 or sale of Defendant’s goods; 3.) Furthermore, Defendant is ordered to cancel, 7 withdraw and recall all its promotions, advertisements and merchandise bearing 8 Plaintiff’s Mark or any confusingly similar simulation to Plaintiff’s Mark, which 9 have been published, placed or shipped by Defendant or under Defendant’s 10 authority, to any person, entity, or customer, including, without limitation, any 11 publisher, agency, wholesaler, distributor, retailer, consignor or marketer, and also 12 deliver to each publisher or customer a copy of this Court's order as it relates to said 13 injunctive relief against Defendant. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED: 16 Dated: February 26, 2009 17 18 19 By: HON. FLORENCE-MARIE COOPER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED JUDGMENT BY COURT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.