Heuft Systemtechnik GmbH v. Industrial Dynamics Co Ltd, No. 2:2005cv06299 - Document 365 (C.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by Judge George P. Schiavelli: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREEDthat: 1) Defendant IDC did not use its outer sidewall inspection devices in a manner that infringed Claims 1, 2, and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,974, owned by Heuft; 2) Defenda nt IDC's outer sidewall inspection devices did not infringe on Claims 6, 7 and 8 of Heuft's Patent No. 6,298,974; 3) Plaintiff is ordered to reimburse Defendant in the amount of $39,287.39, which is the amount Defendant paid Plaintiff pursuant to the Courts Bill of Costs order dated, 12/13/2007. The payment must be made within 10 days of the entry of this Order; 4) Defendant is the prevailing party. This Judgment does not alter the remaining findings from the 7/6/2007 Final Judgment to the extent they are consistent with this Judgment and the Opinion of the Federal Circuit. (jp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Heuft Systemtechnik GmbH v. Industrial Dynamics Co Ltd Doc. 365 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 HEUFT SYSTEMTECHNIK GMBH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS CO., LTD., ) AND STEVE CALHOUN, ) ) Defendant(s), ) ________________________________ ) NO. CV 05-6299-GPS (JTLx) JUDGMENT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 In light of the remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, this Court enters judgment in favor of Industrial Dynamics Co. (“IDC”) and against HEUFT SYSTEMTECHNIK GMBH (“HEUFT”) . Thus, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. 23 24 infringed Claims 1, 2, and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,974, owned by Heuft . 2. 25 26 27 Defendant IDC did not use its outer sidewall inspection devices in a manner that Defendant IDC’s outer sidewall inspection devices did not infringe on Claims 6, 7 and 8 of Heuft’s Patent No. 6,298,974. 3. Plaintiff is ordered to reimburse Defendant in the amount of $39,287.39, which is the amount Defendant paid Plaintiff pursuant to the Court’s Bill of Costs order dated 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 December 13, 2007. The payment must be made within 10 days of the entry of this 2 Order. 3 4. Defendant is the prevailing party. 4 5 6 This Judgment does not alter the remaining findings from the July 6, 2007 Final Judgment to the extent they are consistent with this Judgment and the Opinion of the Federal Circuit. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated this_5th___ day of October 2008. 13 14 15 ______________________________________ THE HONORABLE GEORGE P. SCHIAVELLI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
