Christopher Du Pree v. Jennie Woodford et al, No. 2:2004cv03484 - Document 202 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING (1) THIRD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Audrey B. Collins for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 186 : The Court has reviewed the file in this matter, and has read and reviewed the Third Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which P laintiff has objected. Therefore, the Court: 1. accepts the findings and recommendations in the Third Report And Recommendation and the Supplemental Report And Recommendation; 2. grants in part and denies in part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgmen t, as discussed in the Third Report; 3. dismisses with prejudice all Defendants except Fortaleza, Trinidad and Brisner; 4. dismisses all portions of the action with prejudice except the claims of deliberate medical indifference against Fortaleza, Trinidad and Brisner; and 5. withdraws the reference of this action to the Magistrate Judge. (bm)

Download PDF
Christopher Du Pree v. Jennie Woodford et al Doc. 202 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER DUPREE, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 04-03484 ABC (RZ) ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING (1) THIRD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 The Court has reviewed the file in this matter, and has read and reviewed the 18 Third Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of 19 United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of 20 those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. 21 Therefore, the Court: 22 1. accepts the findings and recommendations in the Third Report 23 And 24 Recommendation; 25 2. 28 and the Supplemental Report And grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, as discussed in the Third Report; 26 27 Recommendation 3. dismisses with prejudice all Defendants except Fortaleza, Trinidad and Brisner; Dockets.Justia.com 1 4. dismisses all portions of the action with prejudice except the claims of 2 deliberate medical indifference against Fortaleza, Trinidad and Brisner; 3 and 4 5. withdraws the reference of this action to the Magistrate Judge. 5 6 DATED: October 31, 2008 7 8 9 AUDREY B. COLLINS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.