Southern CA Water Co v. Aerojet-General Corp, et al, No. 2:2002cv06340 - Document 749 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CLOSING CASE by Judge Audrey B. Collins: As a result of the various Orders re Dismissal of the defendants in this action and those defendants' respective cross-complaints and third-party complaints, if any, the vario us Order Approving Settlements of the defendants and Issuing Bar Orders, and the Order to Dismiss Remaining Claims, the Court finds that there are no remaining claims to adjudicate in the above-referenced matter and therefore enters a final Judgment and Order closing this case. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Southern CA Water Co v. Aerojet-General Corp, et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Doc. 749 Steven L. Hoch, Esq. (SBN 59505) MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP E-mail: shoch@mpplaw.com MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP 1055 W. Seventh Street, 24th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 891-9100 Facsimile: (213) 488-1178 JS-6 cc: timg@thegallaghergroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY 12 14 Audrey B. Collins, Judge Presiding Rosalyn M. Chapman, Referral Date filed: 08/14/2002 Plaintiff, 13 Case No. CV-02-06340-ABC (RCx) v. 15 AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CLOSING CASE AND RELATED CROSSCOMPLAINTS AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT 19 As a result of the various Orders re Dismissal of the defendants in this action and 20 those defendants’ respective cross-complaints and third-party complaints, if any, the 21 various Order Approving Settlements of the defendants and Issuing Bar Orders, and the 22 Order to Dismiss Remaining Claims, the Court finds that there are no remaining claims to 23 adjudicate in the above-referenced matter and therefore enters a final Judgment and Order 24 closing this case. All parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 25 26 Dated: 2/20/13_________________ By: Judge of the U.S. District Court 27 28 L0409193 -1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER CLOSING CASE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
