Monterey Park City v. Aerojet-General Corp, et al, No. 2:2002cv05909 - Document 578 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT AND ORDER CLOSING CASE by Judge Audrey B. Collins: As a result of the various Orders re Dismissal of the defendants in this action and those defendants' respective cross-complaints and third-party complaints, if any, the various Orde r Approving Settlements of the defendants and Issuing Bar Orders, and the Order to Dismiss Remaining Claims, the Court finds that there are no remaining claims to adjudicate in the above-referenced matter and therefore enters a final Judgment and Order closing this case. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

Download PDF
Monterey Park City v. Aerojet-General Corp, et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 Doc. 578 MARK D. HENSLEY, State Bar No. 142653 City Attorney, City of Monterey Park JOHN C. COTTI, State Bar No. 193139 JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP Manhattan Towers 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 110 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Telephone: (310) 643-8448 Facsimile: (310) 643-8441 Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF MONTEREY PARK JS-6 Exempt from fees pursuant to Government Code § 6103 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, Case No. CV 02-05909 ABC (RCx) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER CLOSING CASE v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, et al. Hearing Date: [No Hearing Scheduled] Time: Courtroom: Judge: Hon. Audrey B. Collins Defendants. AND RELATED CROSSCOMPLAINTS AND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT. 18 19 As a result of the various Orders re Dismissal of the defendants in this action and 20 those defendants’ respective cross-complaints and third-party complaints, if any, the various 21 Order Approving Settlements of the defendants and Issuing Bar Orders, and the Order to 22 Dismiss Remaining Claims, the Court finds that there are no remaining claims to adjudicate 23 in the above-referenced matter and therefore enters a final Judgment and Order closing this 24 case. All parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 25 26 Dated: 2/20/13__________________ Judge of the U.S. District Court 27 28 By: cc: timg@thegallaghergroup.com 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER CLOSING CASE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.