Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Ritter et al, No. 6:2014cv06087 - Document 25 (W.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT as set forth in the 24 Memorandum Opinion and Order and the Clerk of the Court is directed to distribute the Interpleader Funds deposited in the Registry of the Court to separate defendant Carolyn Ritter, individually; further action is dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 23, 2014. (rw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Ritter et al Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 14-6087 CAROLYN RITTER, as Administratrix of the Estate of Judy D. Ritter, as Administratrix of the Estate of David W. Ritter, and individually; DEBBIE COOLEY; DIEDRA LEE; and GEORGE DONNIE LEE RITTER DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed Carolyn contemporaneously Ritter’s Motion for herewith, Summary Separate Judgment (Doc. Defendant 20) is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Carolyn Ritter, individually, is the owner, and entitled to possession, of the benefits of David W. Ritter’s life insurance plan. The Clerk of Court is directed to distribute the Interpleader Funds deposited in the Registry of the Court to Separate Defendant Carolyn Ritter, individually. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the parties to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of December, 2014. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
