Lippe v. Stone Bank et al, No. 3:2021cv03043 - Document 231 (W.D. Ark. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 227 Stone Bank's Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted and GRANTING 163 Stone Bank's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on September 16, 2022. (Brooks, Timothy)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION NATHAN LIPPE V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:21-CV-03043 STONE BANK DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER GRANTED DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. I. MOTION FOR ORDER DECLARING REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION DEEMED ADMITTED Lippe v. Stone Bank et al Doc. 231 See II. SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT A. Background See See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Canada v. Union Elec. Co. 3. SECURED DEBTS. A. Specific Debts B. All Debts. Id. B. Discussion Hatchell v. Wren McQuillan v. Mercedes–Benz Credit Corp. Equity Bank v. Southside Baptist Church of Lead Hill Id. Hendrickson v. Farmers’ Bank & Tr. Co. Hendrickson Id. See id. Am. Bank & Tr. Co. v. First Nat. Bank Id. In re Dorsey Elec. Supply Co. Hendrickson See Equity Bank all See a new debt.” Refinancing III. CONCLUSION GRANTED IT IS SO ORDERED DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
