Dacheff v. Mayfield et al, No. 3:2015cv03113 - Document 45 (W.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting Motions 38 & 41 . This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to obey the orders of the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see order for specifics.. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on February 13, 2017. (rg)

Download PDF

Dacheff v. Mayfield et al Doc. 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION RICHARD C. DACHEFF, Ill V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:15-cv-03113 SHERIFF RANDY MAYFIELD, Carroll County, Arkansas; WARDEN DANNY HICKMAN; NURSE CRYSTAL BRINTON; LIEUTENANT JAUN CRIBBS; SERGEANT ANDREA MORRELL; OFFICER LIZ MARTINEZ (SALADONA); and OFFICER PRUITT DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER This is a civil rights case filed by the Plaintiff Richard C. Dacheff, Ill, under the provisions of 42 U.S.C . § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis and prose. When he filed this case, Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Carroll County Detention Center (CCDC) . Subsequently, he was released and is no longer incarcerated. By order (Doc. 37) entered on November 17, 2016, the Defendants' motion to compel was granted . Plaintiff was directed to provide Defendants with discovery responses by December 5, 2016 . On December 6, 2016 , Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 38) stating they had not received the discovery responses . On December 28 , 2016 , a show cause order (Doc. 40) was entered . Plaintiff was given until January 17, 2016, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to comply with the Court's order. Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond to the show cause order would result in the dismissal of the case. Plaintiff did not respond to the show cause order. The order was not returned as 1 Dockets.Justia.com undeliverable. Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court in anyway. On February 2, 2017, Defendants filed another motion to dismiss (Doc. 41 ). For these reasons , the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docs. 38 & 41) are granted . This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to obey the orders of the Court. Ji.ed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED this ~!'cJay of February, 2r1-t~,....... s ISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.