Dixon v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, No. 3:2015cv03003 - Document 20 (W.D. Ark. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees, in favor of Jeremy Allen Dixon against Social Security Administration Commissioner in the amount of $5,058.85. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 31, 2016. (rg)

Download PDF
Dixon v. Social Security Administration Commissioner Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION JEREMY ALLEN DIXON v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 3:15-cv-3003-MEF CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending now before this Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). ECF No. 17. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, and pursuant to said authority, the Court issues this Order. ECF No. 9. On May 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the Equal Access to Justice Act (hereinafter “EAJA”), requesting $5,364.50, representing a total of 27.90 attorney hours for work performed in 2014, 2015, and 2016 at an hourly rate of $190.00 and $63.50 in expenses. ECF No. 17. On June 3, 2016, the Defendant filed a response objecting to several of the hours for which compensation is sought, the hourly rate requested, and the expenses claimed. ECF No. 18. On June 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed a reply, conceding to the Defendant’s objections. ECF No. 19. It is the opinion of the undersigned that the Plaintiff is entitled to a fee award in this case, as he is the prevailing party, the government’s decision to deny benefits was not “substantially justified,” and he is entitled to an hourly rate greater than $75.00. See Jackson v. Bowen, 807 F.2d 127, 128 (8th Cir. 1986) (burden is on the Commissioner to show substantial justification for the government’s denial of benefits) and Johnson v. Sullivan, 919 F.2d 503 (8th Cir. 1990) (the hourly 1 Dockets.Justia.com rate may be increased when there is “uncontested proof of an increase in the cost of living sufficient to justify hourly attorney’s fees of more than $75.00 an hour). However, we agree with the Defendant’s objections. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to an attorney’s fee award under EAJA of $5,053.85, which includes $5,030.35 in attorney fees and $23.50 in postage expenses. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528 (2010), the EAJA fee award should be made payable to Plaintiff. However, as a matter of practice, an EAJA fee made payable to Plaintiff may properly be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. The parties are reminded that, in order to prevent double recovery by counsel for the Plaintiff, the award herein under the EAJA will be taken into account at such time as a reasonable fee is determined pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406. IV. Conclusion: Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiff is awarded the sum of $5,058.85 for attorney’s fees pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Dated this 31st day of August 2016. /s/ Mark E. Ford HONORABLE MARK E. FORD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.